Congress and House Donations from the NRA 0 351

congress and nra

H/T NYTIMES.com – Most Americans support stronger gun laws — laws that would reduce deaths. But Republicans in Congress stand in the way. They fear alienating their primary voters and the National Rifle Association.

Below are the top 10 career recipients of N.R.A. funding – through donations or spending to benefit the candidate – among both current House and Senate members, along with their statements about the Las Vegas massacre. These representatives have a lot to say about it. All the while, they refuse to do anything to avoid the next massacre.

Senate
1. John McCain
Ariz.
“Cindy & I are praying for the victims of the terrible #LasVegasShooting & their families.”
$7,740,521
FROM THE N.R.A.
2. Richard Burr
N.C.
“My heart is with the people of Las Vegas and their first responders today. This morning’s tragic violence has absolutely no place here in America.”
$6,986,620
FROM THE N.R.A.
3. Roy Blunt
Mo.
“Saddened by the tragic loss of life in #LasVegas. My thoughts are with all of the families affected by this horrific attack.”
$4,551,146
FROM THE N.R.A.
4. Thom Tillis
N.C.
“Susan and I send our deepest condolences and prayers to the families of the victims of this horrific and senseless tragedy in Las Vegas.”
$4,418,012
FROM THE N.R.A.
5. Cory Gardner
Co.
“My family and I are praying for the families of those injured and killed in Las Vegas last night.”
$3,879,064
FROM THE N.R.A.
6. Marco Rubio
Fla.
“I’m praying for all the victims, their families, and our first responders in the #LasVegas #MandalayBay shooting.”
$3,303,355
FROM THE N.R.A.
7. Joni Ernst
Iowa
“My prayers are with all of the victims in Las Vegas, and their loved ones affected by this senseless act of violence.”
$3,124,273
FROM THE N.R.A.
8. Rob Portman
Ohio
“Jane & I mourn the loss of innocent lives in this horrific attack in Las Vegas last night. We are praying for those taken from us, their families & all those injured in this attack.”
$3,061,941
FROM THE N.R.A.
9. Todd Young
Ind.
“We must offer our full support to the victims and their families as our nation mourns.”
$2,896,732
FROM THE N.R.A.
10. Bill Cassidy
La.
“Following closely the horrendous act of violence in Las Vegas. Our prayers are with those who were injured, killed and their families.”
$2,861,047
FROM THE N.R.A.
House
1. French Hill
Ark.
“Martha and I are praying for the families and victims of this senseless act of evil. […] We must continue to work together to stop this kind of terror.”
$1,089,477
FROM THE N.R.A.
2. Ken Buck
Co.
“I’m praying for all of those impacted by the evil events in Las Vegas last night. Our country must stand together in support of the families of the victims and the community.”
$800,544
FROM THE N.R.A.
3. David Young
Iowa
“My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families and friends of the horrific and evil tragedy in Las Vegas.”
$707,662
FROM THE N.R.A.
4. Mike Simpson
Idaho
“Though no words can heal our hurt, and no explanation will ever feel sufficient, I pray that all involved may find comfort as we process this devastating tragedy.”
$385,731
FROM THE N.R.A.
5. Greg Gianforte
Mont.
No statement released.
$344,630
FROM THE N.R.A.
6. Don Young
Alaska
“Anne and I are praying for all those involved or impacted by this heinous act of violence.”
$245,720
FROM THE N.R.A.
7. Lloyd Smucker
Pa.
“Horrific act of violence in Las Vegas. Cindy and I pray for the victims, their families, and the first responders.”
$221,736
FROM THE N.R.A.
8. Bruce Poliquin
Maine
“My thoughts are with all those effected in the horrifying attacks in Las Vegas. The nation is with you.”
$201,398
FROM THE N.R.A.
9. Pete Sessions
Tex.
“My deepest sympathies are with all who were harmed by this horrific tragedy.”
$158,111
FROM THE N.R.A.
10. Barbara Comstock
Va.
“I am heartbroken by the mass murder that took place last night in Las Vegas and I am praying for the victims, families, and first responders.”
$137,232
FROM THE N.R.A.

All of these representatives are Republican. The highest rankedDemocrat in the House is Sanford Bishop, who ranks 41st in career donations from the N.R.A. Among the top 100 House recipients, 95 are Republican. In the Senate, the top two Democrats are Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who rank 52nd and 53rd — behind every Republican but Dan Sullivan of Alaska.

Finally, why are our numbers different from those in Bret Stephens’s column on the Second Amendment? Because ours include money the N.R.A. spends on behalf of candidates, in addition to money it gives directly to candidates.

Correction: Oct. 4, 2017 
An earlier version of this graphic misidentified the home state of Representative Don Young. He is from Alaska, not Arkansas. It also included incorrect data from the Center for Responsive Politics, which they have since corrected. The total amount from the N.R.A. that benefited Senator Richard Burr was $6.99 million, not $5.90 million.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Leave a Reply

TONY PERKINS HAS HOME DESTROYED BY FLOOD 0 364

tony perkins home destroyed by flood

Flooding in Louisiana has been called the worst US disaster since Hurricane Sandy by the Red Cross. At least 13 people have died, and thousands have been forced to flee their homes as water approached. People have been pulling together, but the entire thing is pretty grim.

There is one glimmer of good news, though. Tony Perkins is the leader of the Family Research Council and once claimed that God sends natural disasters to punish homosexuals and women who have abortions.

TONY PERKINS HOME FLOOD

In a 2015 interview he agreed with Messianic Jewish pastor Jonathan Cahn that Hurricane Joaquin, which killed 34 people last year, was “a sign of God’s wrath,” and punishment for the legalization of same-sex marriage.

He’s also compared homosexuality to pedophilia. “It is a homosexual problem,” he said. Later adding that “the homosexual community” is engaged in behavior “that will destroy our nation.”

Well, you’ll be pleased to learn that Perkin’s house has been all but destroyed by the flooding. He phoned into his own radio show to say he now faced six months of living in a camper:

“This is a flood of near-biblical proportions. We had to escape from our home Saturday by canoe. We had about 10 feet of water at the end of our driveway. Our house flooded, a few of our cars flooded.”

None of his family were injured so yes, it’s ok to laugh. I know that it lowers ourselves to his level, but I just can’t stop smiling.

TONY PERKINS HOME FLOOD 1

Sadly, he actually has a place to stay, which is a lot more than can be said for the vast majority of those in the affected area. You can donate to the Red Cross’ efforts in Louisiana here.

HBO’S ‘THE NIGHT OF’ AND THE ISSUES WITH OUR COURT SYSTEM 0 297

the night of and our court system

The first episode of The Night Of asks the question: What would you do if you were accused of a horrible crime that you had no recollection of committing? By the third episode, which aired on Sunday night, we have our answer: It doesn’t matter what you do. From the moment you are arrested, you give up control over your life.

The Night Of is about a murder, but it is not a murder mystery: The act itself, which formed the centerpiece of the fantastic first episode, has receded into the background. Even the police investigation appears to be essentially over, and we’re given no new clues about that titular night. What’s left is the long aftermath, which finds our major characters utterly helpless in the face of a system that has tightened around them.

First, there are Naz’s parents, Salim and Safar Khan, played with a dignity that threatens to slide into confusion or anger by Peyman Moaadi and Poorna Jagannathan. They visit their son in Riker’s Island, but there’s nothing they can do. They are approached by John Stone (John Turturro), who offers to represent Naz for $50,000; they say nothing—who has that kind of money? A more polished lawyer from a big firm named Allison Crowe appears and says she’ll do the case for free, and of course, they accept. Naz’s father tries to get his cab back only to be told that since it was used in commission of a crime, there’s a good chance he’ll never see it again, unless he presses charges. The cop who tells Salim this is good-natured—sympathetic, even—but it doesn’t matter what sort of face power has. The point is that it’s power, and you can’t change its mind.

Stone finds himself in similar straits. He starts the episode trying to wheel and deal his way toward the beginning of a plea bargain, but his sweaty, eczematic charm gets him nowhere with the prosecutors. He then does the legwork of a good, if under-resourced, defense attorney—visiting the crime scene, buying Naz socks—but loses his client anyway. He can’t even do anything about the plight of the cat that lived in the dead girl’s apartment, except bring it to animal control, where it’s sentenced to be gassed to death in ten days.

But this is ultimately a show about Naz, and it’s through him that we really get a sense of narrowed options and impossible choices. Riz Ahmed continues to be brilliant in his portrayal of the defendant, quivering with fear and nerves as he walks through a version of Riker’s Island stripped of color. Other inmates, more experienced and violent than he, stare him down. The guards either ask him bureaucratic questions (“Homosexual?”) or exist to do the bidding of the jail’s prisoner-king, Freddy (played by Michael K. Williams, who also hosts a show on VICELAND).

It doesn’t matter what sort of face power has. The point is that it’s power, and you can’t change its mind.

Without Freddy, this episode might have been a little dull. There is little in the way of movement on the case, no twists or reversals to drive the plot forward, so the introduction of a new predator into the ecosystem does a lot of work. In the show’s understated way, we learn a lot about him in a few minutes of almost dialogue-free action: He’s a former boxer who wields outsized power in Rikers—check out the collection of phones in his cell—and has a kind of intellectual self-confidence—look at his Norman Mailer book, or listen to the way he casually drops reference to the specific African region his ancestors hailed from. He’s having an affair with one guard, apparently so she can smuggle goods for him, and keeps others in line by threatening their families on the outside. Freddy makes choices that matter; he gets what he wants.

Freddy’s the sort of character who delvers koan-ish pronouncements about how the calves raised to become veal are kept in dark crates, the sort of character who is basically a mythological creature in a show about functionaries. (Try to imagine him and Stone occupying the same scene.) Williams served this function in The Wire, too, where his Omar broke every rule about the realism the other, less legendary characters had to follow, and he’s a welcome presence in an episode that would otherwise lack much in the way of an antagonist (Bill Camp’s Detective Box, who filled that role last time, is largely MIA here).

Freddy is the one who gives Naz his only choice of the episode. The young accused murderer doesn’t get to pick where he sleeps or who his lawyer is or how the law will treat him, but he can accept Freddy’s offer of protection or not. Naz is down the rabbit hole, but he’s not himself ready to start a relationship with a full-blown gangster. Then, in the last scene of the episode, he walks from the bathroom to find a fire burning, the other inmates standing around it and staring him down, making various “I’m going to kill you” gestures. It turns out this isn’t a choice either.

The system Naz has been taken inside is transactional in nature. No one does anything out of the goodness of their hearts, possibly because they don’t have much in the way of either goodness or hearts. Crowe’s proposal to represent Naz pro bono almost certainly comes with strings attached; that she brings a young South Asian lawyer (Amara Karan) with her to meet Naz’s parents speaks to her extreme pragmatism, or her cold-eyed ruthlessness. Freddy, similarly, is not a man who does something for nothing. But your benefactors’ motives don’t matter when you don’t have any other options. For now, the characters are left in the same position as the viewers: waiting for that other shoe to drop, and knowing that no matter how bad things are, they can always get worse.

VIA VICE

Editor Picks